Abstract
The food safety law of the People's Republic of China (revised draft) will use the most stringent regulations, the supervision of food safety but not edible agricultural products should be brought into the draft regulation scope, and it certainly gave food regulatory loopholes. Edible agricultural products should be brought into the draft regulation, there is no obstacle on the legislation, but so will bring the government law enforcement ability insufficiency, the rise in the cost of law enforcement, law enforcement measures defects and a series of practical problems. Therefore, the key to solve the problem lies not in the legislation, but in the legislation and how to achieve the effective regulation of edible agricultural products. Article probes into the reasons for the internal problems, put forward the food safety force system of classified management, to improve the existing regulatory system.
Publication Date
2-28-2015
First Page
277
Last Page
280
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2015.01.065
Recommended Citation
Li, HE
(2015)
"Some discussions on improving path of China's food safety supervision mechanism,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 31:
Iss.
1, Article 65.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2015.01.065
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol31/iss1/65
References
[1] 廉恩臣. 欧盟食品安全法律体系评析［J］.政法论丛,2010(2):94～100.
[2] 齐萌.从威权管制到合作治理: 我国食品安全监管模式之转型［J］.河北法学,2013(3):50～56.
[3] 陈彦彦.论政府在农产品质量安全监管中的职能定位［J］.中国行政管理,2008(6):79～81.
[4] 任燕,安玉发.政府在食品安全监管中的职能转变与策略选择———基于北京市场的案例调研［J］.公共管理学报,2011(1):16～25.
[5] 管淞凝.美国、欧盟食品安全监管模式探析及其对我国的借鉴意义［J］.当代社科视野, 2009(1):39～42.
[6] 唐金成,闭潇丽.我国食品安全强制责任保险制度研究［J］.区域金融研究,2014(2):24～30.
[7] 冉斯文.缺陷食品大规模侵权损害救济机制探析［J］.法制与经济，2012(2):94～95.
[8] 贾爱玲.环境损害救济的企业互助基金制度研究［J］.云南社会科学,2011(1):106～109.
[9] 王利明. 侵权行为法研究(上卷)［M］. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2004:97.
[10] 尹红强.论食品安全法律中的民事责任制度——兼论《食品安全法》（修订草案送审稿）中的相关规定［J］. 食品科学, 2014, 35(1)：298～302.