Abstract
To understand the difference in the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of Cabernet Franc berries where were from two different terrain vineyards in the Loess Plateau region, the physicochemical index, antioxidant activities, the phenolic composition and concentration of grape samples were determined. The results showed that the different kind of phenolic compound contents of grape berries were not uniform variation law; The antioxidant activities of slope land berries was lower than the flat land berries; The total 17 individual anthocyanin compounds were identified in flat and slope land berries (including 12 anthocyanin deriatives and 5 basic anthocyanins); Terrain conditions had no effect on anthocyanin composition, but had effect on anthocyanin concentration in different extent; The concentration of 5 basic anthocyanins from slope land vineyard berries were higher than flat land berries. So the terrain condition of vineyard could really influence the phenolics composition and content, antioxidant activity of Cabernet Franc berries.
Publication Date
4-28-2015
First Page
80
Last Page
82,97
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2015.02.016
Recommended Citation
Bao, JIANG; Meijuan, LUO; and Zhenwen, ZHANG
(2015)
"Analysis of polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Cabernet Franc berries in different terrain conditions,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 31:
Iss.
2, Article 16.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2015.02.016
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol31/iss2/16
References
[1] 丁仁君, 夏延斌. 葡萄酒中的有机酸及检测方法研究进展[J]. 食品与机械, 2014, 30(1): 243~247.
[2] Mateus N, Proenca S, Ribeiro P, et al. Grape and wine polyphenolic composition of red Vitis vinifera.L varieties concerning vineyard altitude[J]. Ciênciae Tecnologia de Alimentos, 2001, 3(2): 102~110.
[3] 何建军. 影响酿酒葡萄果实花色苷结构修饰的因素分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2010.
[4] 王华. 葡萄与葡萄酒实验技术操作规范[M]. 西安: 西安地图出版社, 1999: 152~153.
[5] Rapisarda P, Tomaino A, Lo Cascio R, et al. Antioxidant effectiveness as influenced by phenolic content of fresh orange juices[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47(11): 4 718~4 723.
[6] Kim D O, Chun O K, Kim Y J, et al. Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(22): 6 509~6 515.
[7] Li Y G, Tanner G, Larkin P. The DMACA-HCl protocol and the threshold proanthocyanidin content for bloat safety in forage legumes[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1996, 70 (1): 89~101.
[8] Orak H H. Total antioxidant activities, phenolics, anthocyanins, polyphenol oxidase activities of selected red grape cultivars and their correlations[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2007, 111(3): 235~241.
[9] Brandwilliams W, Cuvelier M E, Berset C. Use of a free-radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 1995, 28(1): 25~30.
[10] Apak R, Guclu K, Ozyurek M, et al. Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupricion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, 52(26): 7 970~7 981.
[11] Takayoshi Y, Seok T J, Nami G Y, et al. Effects of temperature on anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berry skins[J]. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2006, 57(1): 54~59.
[12] Hess S. Exploring high altitude viticulture. (2007—10—04)[2014—07—10].http://www.theelevationofwine.org/press.
[13] Radovanovic' B, Radovanovic' A. Free radical scavenging activity and anthocyanin profile of Cabernet Sauvignon wines from the Balkan region[J]. Molecules, 2010, 15(6): 4 213~4 226.