•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In order to investigate the beef quality changes under handling cattle in different platform slope, Twenty simon tal beef cattle were randomly divided into 4 groups, the cow is respectively loading and unloading through (30,40,50 °) slope, then cattle are slaughtered. The pH value, flesh-colored, drip loss percentage, cooking loss percentage and shear force of postmortem beef were measured respectively. Results showed, with the increase of loading platform slope, pH values, L* value and a* value of postmortem beef significantly decreased (P<0.05), while shear force, b* value, drip loss and cooking loss of postmortem beef significantly increased (P<0.05). This study indicated that beef quality was better through handling cattle in 30 degrees platform slope, and it should be reduced platform slope in cattle actual production thereby improve beef quality.

Publication Date

11-28-2016

First Page

126

Last Page

128,236

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2016.11.028

References

[1] 牛蕾, 张志胜, 李海鹏, 等. 中国西门塔尔牛不同部位肉品质评定[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2011, 38(3): 217-220.
[2] 芦春莲, 曹玉凤, 李建国, 等. 宰前运输应激对肉牛屠宰性能和牛肉品质的影响[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2015, 35(12): 2 045-2 048.
[3] MOUNIER L, DUBROEUCQ H, ANDANSON S, et al. Variations in meat pH of beef bulls in relation to conditions of transfer to slaughter and previous history of the animals [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 84(6): 1 567-1 576.
[4] MARA G A, VILLARROEL M, SAUDO C, et al Effect of transport time and ageing on aspects of beef quality [J]. Meat Science, 2003, 65(4): 1 335-1 340.
[5] ADEYEMI I G, ADEYEMO O K, ALLI O A. Economic loss from transportation stress in slaughter cattle: the case of Akinyele cattle market Nigeria [J]. Bull Anim Hlth Prod Afr, 2010, 58(1): 89-94.
[6] FERGUSON D M, WARNER R D. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants [J]. Meat Science, 2008, 80(1): 12-19.
[7] HAMBRECHT E, EISSEN J J, NEWMAN D J, et al. Negative effects of stress immediately before slaughter on pork quality areaggravated by suboptimal transport and lairage conditions [J]. T Anim Sci, 2005, 83(2): 440-448.
[8] 邓红雨, 范佳英, 高腾云. 牛只运输时坡道装卸对其体温和行为的影响[J]. 农业工程报, 2012, 28(1): 197-200.
[9] 谷英, 孙海洲, 桑丹, 等. 肉品质评定指标及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40(7): 100-106.
[10] 吴文锦, 汪兰, 丁安子, 等. 包装材料和包装方式对贮藏过程中鸭肉品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(6): 139-143.
[11] 王薇, 罗瑞明, 李俊丽, 等. 不同贮藏温度下滩羊肉的保水性与色泽变化特性[J]. 食品与机械, 2015, 31(3): 140-144.
[12] 夏安琪, 李欣, 陈丽, 等. 不同宰前运输时间对羊肉品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2014, 30(9): 230-235.
[13] 姜秀丽, 刁小琴, 孔保华, 等. 烘干时间对牛肉干水分分布与品质变化的影响[J]. 肉类研究, 2016, 30(4): 30-34.
[14] HILL F. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of vannus ages [J]. Journal of Food Science, 1966, 31(2): 161-166.
[15] 吴强, 戴四发. 超声波结合氯化钙处理对牛肉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 31(19): 141-145.
[16] 段虎, 王祎娟, 马汉军. 超高压处理对肉及肉制品食用品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2011, 27(1): 151-154.
[17] 张丽, 王莉, 周玉春, 等. 宜宰后成熟时间提高牦牛肉品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(15): 325-331.
[18] 李思宁, 唐善虎, 王柳. 冻藏物流过程中制冷故障对生鲜牦牛肉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(10): 246-251.
[19] 赵菲, 刘敬斌, 关文强, 等. 超高压处理对冰温保鲜牛肉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(12): 238-241.
[20] 张丽, 王莉, 周玉春, 等. 适宜宰后成熟时间提高牦牛肉品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(15): 325-331.
[21] 赵慧, 甄少波, 任发政, 等. 待宰时间和致晕方式对生猪应激及猪肉品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(4): 272-276.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.