Abstract
The thermophysical properties of tobacco and smoke agent (the mass ratio of glycerol and propylene glycol is 51) was measured by transient plane heat source method, and the effects of moisture and smoke agent content on reconstituted cut tobacco and flue-cured were measured. The results showed that with the increase of temperature (22～75 ℃), thermal conductivity \[0.06～0.12 W/(m·K) and 0.06～0.16 W/(m·K\] and volume heat capacity \[0.17～2.70 MJ/(m3K) and 0.15～1.45 MJ/(m3K)\] increased; however, the thermal diffusivity decreased (0.33～0.05 mm2 / s and 0.40～0.09 mm2 / s, respectively). With the increase of moisture content (0%～13%) , the thermal conductivity and the volume heat capacity of tobacco materials increased, however, the thermal diffusivity decreased. With the increase of smoke agent content (0%～25%), the thermal conductivity of tobacco material \[0.005 W/(m·K) and 0.006 W/(m·K)\], the volume heat \[0.106 MJ/(m3K) and 0.138 MJ/(m3K)\] increased slightly, but the thermal diffusivity decreased ( 0.069 mm2 / s and 0.069 mm2 / s, respectively).
Publication Date
9-28-2017
First Page
69
Last Page
73
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2017.09.014
Recommended Citation
Yaping, MA; Chaoxian, LIU; Le, WANG; Mingjian, ZHANG; Ke, ZHANG; Nan, DENG; Duanfeng, LU; Jianguo, TANG; and Xiangzhen, LIU
(2017)
"Study on thermophysical properties of tobacco and smoke agent under different temperature,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 33:
Iss.
9, Article 14.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2017.09.014
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol33/iss9/14
References
[1] DEBETHIZY J D, BORGERDING M F, DOOLITTLE D J, et al. Chemical and biological studies of a cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco[J]. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990, 30(8): 755-763.
[2] COGGINS C R E, AYRES P H, MOSBERG A T, et al. Ninety-day inhalation study in rats, comparing smoke from cigarettes that heat tobacco with those that burn tobacco[J]. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1989, 13(3): 460-483.
[3] COGGINS C R E, AYRES P H, MOSBERG A T, et al. Comparative inhalation study in rats, using a second prototype of a cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco[J]. Inhalation Toxicology, 1989, 1(3): 197-226.
[4] BROWN B, KOLESAR J, LINDBERG K, et al. Comparative studies of DNA adduct formation in mice following dermal application of smoke condensates from cigarettes that burn or primarily heat tobacco[J]. Mutat Res, 1998, 414(1/2/3): 21-30.
[5] 杨继, 杨帅, 段沅杏, 等. 加热不燃烧卷烟烟草材料的热分析研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(6): 7-13.
[6] 杨继, 汤建国, 尚善斋, 等. 利用顶空-GC/MS 法对比新型卷烟和传统卷烟的挥发性成分[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(11): 33-39.
[7] GUSTAFSSON S E, KARAWACKI E, CHOHAN M A. Thermal transport studies of electrically conducting materials using the transient hot-stripe technique[J]. Phys J. D: App1. Phys., 1986(19): 727-735.
[8] SULEIMAN B M, LARFELDT J, LECKNER B, et al. Thermal conductivity and diffusivity of wood[J]. Wood Science and Technology, 1999, 33(6): 465-473.
[9] SINGH K K, GOSWAMI T K. Thermal properties of cumin seed[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2000, 45(4): 181-187.
[10] GUO W, LIM C J, BI X, et al. Determination of effective thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of wood pellets[J]. Fuel, 2013, 103: 347-355.
[11] 陈则韶, 郭俊成, 贾磊, 等. 用平面热源过渡态平板法同时测定烟叶的 λ, α 和 cp 三种热物性[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2002, 32(3): 309-313.
[12] 陈则韶, 贾磊, 谭洋, 等. 烟草导热系数与含水率的变化关系[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2003, 33(1): 92-98.
[13] 陈则韶, 陈建新, 谭洋, 等. 烟草导热系数与含水率, 堆密度的综合关系[J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2005, 35(1): 124-129.
[14] 韩莹. 利用瞬态平面热源法测量烟丝三种热物性研究[D]. 郑州: 中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院, 2009: 3-10.
[15] 林慧, 堵劲松, 李斌, 等. 基于 TPS 法的烟叶热物性测试及其导热系数预测模型的建立[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(2): 155-160.
[16] 徐迎波, 陈开波, 徐志强, 等. 卷烟烟丝食用蜡复配保润剂的保润性能及应用[J]. 食品与机械, 2017, 33(2): 179-182.
[17] 郭磊, 苏加坤, 罗娟敏, 等. 国内外品牌卷烟中的糖类和多元醇的HPLC法同时测定[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(3): 73-76.
[18] 刘光启. 化学化工物性数据手册: 有机卷[M]. 马连湘, 刘杰. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012: 1-263.
[19] 韩莹, 闫亚明, 刘朝贤, 等. 利用瞬态平面热源法检测烟丝热物性的方法[J]. 烟草科技, 2009(9): 11-14.