Abstract
In order to classify the use direction of different strip sizes of tobacco in cigarette products and improve the value of tobacco leaves, the middle and upper matching module of robust flavor style flue-cured tobacco leaves were used to analyze the quality variation characteristics among different strip sizes of from aspects of chemical component, neutral aroma substances and sensory evaluation. The results indicated that: ① The contents of total sugar, reducing sugar, potassium, nicotine, the ratio of sugar and nicotine, nitrogen and nicotine, the total sensory evaluation score and the scores of sensory indexes except irritant among different strip sizes had significant or extremely significant differences. ② The strips of 25.40～42.00 mm that can replace the higher grade tobacco leaves had highest content of sugar, ratio of sugar and nicotine and lowest contents of protein, the evaluation score of chemical components, the contents of neutral aroma substances, and the sensory evaluation score were all higher than the other sizes and Mix. ③ The chemical components evaluation score, the content of neutral aroma substances, and the sensory evaluation score of 2.36～6.35 mm are all the lowest. ④ The strips of bigger than 42.00 mm have highest content of potassium, ratio of potassium and chlorine, and the overall quality only lower than 25.40～42.00 mm. ⑤ The leaves of different strip sizes by sieved can be reclassified used for widening the scope and improving the value of tobacco leaves.
Publication Date
11-28-2018
First Page
50
Last Page
54
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2018.11.011
Recommended Citation
Chao, LIU; Kuo, ZHAO; Yongfeng, YANG; Wenjuan, CHU; Qiucheng, WEN; Maolin, LIU; Baolin, WANG; Zongcan, YANG; and Xiangzhen, LIU
(2018)
"The quality variation characteristics among different strip sizes of robust flavor style flue-cured tobacco leaf in Henan,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 34:
Iss.
11, Article 10.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2018.11.011
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol34/iss11/10
References
[1] 余娜, 夏艺丰, 朱文魁, 等. 叶片结构与叶丝结构关系模型研究[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报: 自然科学版, 2013, 28(3): 24-28.
[2] 唐军, 邱昌桂, 周冰, 等. 不同尺寸片烟及不同长度成品烟丝化学成分的变化[J]. 烟草科技, 2016, 49(11): 42-55.
[3] 罗登山, 曾静, 刘栋, 等. 叶片结构对卷烟质量影响的研究进展[J]. 郑州轻工业学院学报: 自然科学版, 2010, 25(2): 13-17.
[4] 堵劲松, 申晓锋, 李跃锋, 等. 烟丝结构对卷烟物理指标的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2008(8): 8-13.
[5] 申晓锋, 李华杰, 王锐亮, 等. 烟丝结构与卷烟单支重量和烟支密度及其稳定性的灰色关联分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009, 15(6): 23-26.
[6] 李善莲, 申晓锋, 李华杰, 等. 烟丝结构对卷烟端部落丝量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2010(2): 5-7, 10.
[7] 蔡联合, 邹克兴, 孙建生, 等. 打叶框栏尺寸对烤烟打叶过程中叶片结构及出片率的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2017(8): 78-80.
[8] 徐大勇, 李新锋, 范明登, 等. 复烤温度对片烟收缩率及大小分布的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2013(3): 12-16.
[9] 邱承宇, 管仕栓, 褚智国, 等. 片烟筛分提质试验研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2012, 18(19): 187-188.
[10] 王瑞新. 烟草化学品质分析法[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 1999: 43-120.
[11] 陈胜可. SPSS统计分析从入门到精通[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 187-191.
[12] 刘思峰. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 8版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017: 541-578.
[13] 陈征, 任志广, 范艺宽, 等. 基于灰色关联分析模型的烟叶化学成分评价研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(5): 129-137.
[14] 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏, 等. 中国烟草种植区划[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 3-4.
[15] 江厚龙, 陈涛, 马红辉, 等. 重庆烟区烤烟感官品质主要影响因子分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2014(6): 87-92.
[16] 邵惠芳, 郑聪, 许自成, 等. 西南烟区烤烟pH分布特点及与感官品质的关系[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2010, 31(3): 18-22, 32.
[17] 李新学. 降低烟叶损耗 提高经济效益[J]. 烟草科技, 1990(5): 4.