•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The differences were studied including color, tenderness, pH, protein degradation, and other indicators of beef and mutton at the best slaughter ages of cattle and sheep and the high and low-grade parts of the meat. Samples of longissimus dorsi (YH, NH) and abdominal muscles (YL, NL) of post-mortem Qinchuan beef and horizontal goat meat were taken for determination of pH, color, shear, sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar proteins, the solubility and degradation polymerization conditions. The results shown that the pH value of YL was significantly higher than that of YH (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between the two parts of beef (P>0.05), the pH value of mutton at the same part was significantly higher than that of beef (P<0.05). The L* values of the longissimus thoracis of beef and mutton were significantly higher than those of the external intercostals. The a* value of YH was higher than that of YL, and the b* value of NH was higher than that of NL (P<0.05). The L* value of mutton at the same part was significantly higher than that of beef. The a* value of NL was greater than YL, and the b* value was less than YL (P<0.05). The shear force and myofibrillar protein solubility of the longissimus thoracis of beef and mutton were significantly less than that of the external intercostals, and the sarcoplasmic protein solubility was significantly greater than that of the external intercostals (P<0.05). The mutton shear force and myofibrillar protein solubility of the same part were significantly lower than that of beef, and the sarcoplasmic protein solubility was significantly greater than that of beef (P<0.05). The tenderness and color of the horizontal goat were slightly better than that of the Qinchuan beef. The degradation of the protein was slightly higher than that of the Qinchuan beef. The length of the longissimus dorsi of the cattle and sheep was better than that of the abdominal muscles, and the degree of protein degradation was higher than the abdominal muscles.

Publication Date

9-28-2018

First Page

24

Last Page

29

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2018.09.006

References

[1] 王贵珍, 花立民, 牛钰杰, 等. 中国牛羊肉生产现状及2015~2020年供需预测分析[J]. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(2): 44-51.
[2] 张桂民, 贺花, 郑立, 等. 秦川牛和郏县红牛GBP2基因拷贝数变异检测及其对生长性状的效应分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2018, 54(1): 51-54, 64.
[3] 巴吐尔·阿不力克木, 帕提姑·阿布都克热, 肉孜阿吉, 等. 巴什拜羊肉不同部位的品质特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(9): 1 734-1 741.
[4] LI Chun-bao, LI Jun-sheng, ZHOU Guang-hong, et al. Electrical stimulation affects metabolic enzyme phosphorylation, protease activation, and meat tenderization in beef[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 90(5): 1 638-1 649.
[5] 巴吐尔·阿不力克木, 帕提姑·阿布都可热, 布丽布丽·俄力木汗, 等. 羊品种和解剖部位与羊肉嫩度关系的研究[J]. 农产品加工: 创新版, 2011(11): 55-58, 72.
[6] 魏秀丽, 谢小雷, 张春晖, 等. 猪宰后肌肉体系中 μ-calpain 及肌原纤维蛋白理化特性的变化规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(12): 2 428-2 438.
[7] BAGDATLi A, KAYAARDI S. Influence of storage period and packaging methods on quality attributes of fresh beef steaks[J]. CyTA Journal of Food, 2015, 13(1): 124-133.
[8] 李兆亭, 申基雪, 李舒婷, 等. 迷迭香结合气调包装对牛肉肉色稳定性的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2018, 43(1): 109-114.
[9] 黎颖, 巫坚, 林波, 等. 羊乳及其制品中掺入牛属牛乳和水牛乳的检测[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2015, 34(5): 977-981.
[10] 曲桂娟, 秦贵信. 肉牛肌内脂肪的研宄进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2010, 37(6): 221-222.
[11] 张兰. 传统中式烹饪工艺对牛肉品质影响的研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2017: 1.
[12] 薛瑞, 朱海舰, 王托平, 等. 横山羊肉的品质特征与历史渊源[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2010, 6(11): 63-66.
[13] 胡常红, 王煦, 阎向明. 对饲养不同品种牛屠宰性能的比较研究[J]. 中国畜禽种业, 2009, 5(10): 141-144.
[14] 黄帅, 孙旺斌, 高晔, 等. 陕北白绒山羊屠宰性能和器官发育的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(2): 84-88.
[15] BOWKER B, ZHUANG Hong-ming. Relationship between water-holding capacity and protein denaturation in broiler breast meat[J]. Poultry Science, 2015, 94(7): 1 657.
[16] HUANG Hong-gang, LARSEN M R, KARLSSON A H, et al. Gel-based phosphoproteomics analysis of sarcoplasmic proteins in postmortem porcine muscle with pH decline rate and time differences[J]. Proteomics, 2011, 11(20): 4 063-4 076.
[17] 李兰会, 孙丰梅, 黄娟, 等. 宰后肉品pH值与嫩度[J]. 肉类工业, 2006(12): 28-30.
[18] 潘晓建, 文利, 彭增起, 等. 宰前热应激对肉鸡胸肉pH、氧化和嫩度、肉色及其关系的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2007(5): 91-95.
[19] 马晓冰, 苏琳, 林在琼, 等. 不同品种肉羊肌肉的糖酵解潜力及其与肉品质的相关性[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(15): 1-4.
[20] KHLIJI S, VAN de Ven R, LAMB T A, et al. Relationship between consumer ranking of lamb color and objective measures of color[J]. Meat Science, 2010, 85(2): 224-229.
[21] LAWRIE R A. Obituary[J]. Meat Science, 1988, 24(3): 233.
[22] ROWE L J, MADDOCK K R, LONERGAN S M, et al. Influence of early postmortem protein oxidation on beef quality[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 82: 785-793.
[23] TANG Jia-li, FAUSTMAN C, LEE S, et al. Effect of glutathione on oxymyoglobin oxidation[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(6): 1 691-1 695.
[24] LIANG Rong-rong, ZHU He, MAO Yan-wei, et al. Tenderness and sensory attributes of the longissimus lumborum muscles with different quality grades from Chinese fattened yellow crossbred steers[J]. Meat Science, 2015, 112: 52.
[25] MILLER M F, CARR M A, RAMSEY C B, et al. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2001, 79(12): 3 062.
[26] HUGHES J M, OISETH S K, PURSLOW P P, et al. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness[J]. Meat Science, 2014, 98(3): 520-532.
[27] 魏燕超, 刘满顺, 刘永峰. 宰后成熟过程中羊肉食用品质及蛋白稳定性的变化研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2018, 44(6): 8-11.
[28] 罗欣, 周光宏. 电刺激和延迟冷却对牛肉食用品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 188-194.
[29] VEERAMUTHU G I, SAMS A R. Postmortem pH, myof-ibrillar fragmentation, and calpain activity in pectoralis from electrically stimulated and muscle tensioned broiler carcasses[J].Poultry Science, 1999, 78: 272-276
[30] HUFF-LONERGAN S L. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes[J]. Meat Science, 2005, 71: 194-204.
[31] CHEN Li-juan, LI Xin, NI Na, et al. Phosphorylation of myofibrillar proteins in postmortem ovine muscle with different tenderness[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2016, 96(5): 1 474-1 483.
[32] PRATES J A M, RIBERIRO A M R, CORREIA A D. Role of cysteine endopeptidases (EC 3.4.22) in rabbit meat tenderisation and some related changes[J]. Meat Science, 2001, 57(3): 283-290.
[33] 阎乃珺. 动态高压微射流对小麦面筋蛋白性质和结构的影响[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2013: 7.
[34] 曾淑薇, 李吉, 熊善柏, 等. 磷酸盐对草鱼肌原纤维蛋白结构的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(23): 48-51.
[35] LIN Wan-ling, ZENG Qing-xiao, ZHU Zhi-wei, et al. Relation between protein characteristics and TPA texture characteristics of crisp grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus C. et V) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) [J]. Journal of Texture Studies, 2012, 43(1): 1-11.
[36] 陈琳. Caspase-3在鸡肉成熟过程中的作用以及与calpain的交互关系研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011: 52.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.