Abstract
Many issues areexisting in the legislations about the punitive damages of food consumption. The punitive damages correspond to different types, whole the relevant regulations are scattered and disordered. Specifically, the uncertain foundation of the right to claim and the conflict rules in competition and cooperation are mostly concerned, and the disputes in cases of determining the subjects of legal rights and the subjects of responsibility matter significantly. By analyzing current regulations and cases, the resolutions of these deficiencies are proposed, and the foundation of the right to claim should be determined by the base number types of punitive damages. As for the conflict of multiple responsibility types, the subjects of legal rights safeguarding should be allowed to make choices, and the court shall remind the plaintiff of whether the litigation claims should be changed. To balance the rights of the vulnerable party and maintain the food market order, a distinction should be made between the Profes-sional counterfeit hunters and the Intentional buyers of fake products, and help determining the subjects of the punitive damages of food consumption.
Publication Date
3-28-2020
First Page
80
Last Page
83,90
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.03.015
Recommended Citation
Bao-li, PEI
(2020)
"The improvement strategies of punitive compensationliability for food consumption,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 36:
Iss.
3, Article 15.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.03.015
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol36/iss3/15
References
[1] 刘大洪,段宏磊.消费者保护领域惩罚性赔偿的制度嬗变与未来改进[J].西北政法大学学报:法律科学,2016,34(4):114-123.
[2] 张红.侵权责任之惩罚性赔偿[J].武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2020,73(1):89-101.
[3] 应飞虎.禁止抑或限制:知假买假行为规制研究[J].法学评论,2019,37(4):63-78.
[4] 吉丽颖.法经济学视角下中国食品安全事件的规制维度[J].食品与机械,2018,34(12):63-66.
[5] 岳业鹏.也谈惩罚性赔偿[N].检察日报,2019-06-05(007).
[6] 李长健,鲁爱蓉.食品安全法中惩罚性赔偿制度的适用与完善[J].食品与机械,2018,34(10):60-62,201.
[7] 唐郢.食品领域惩罚性赔偿司法适用研究[J].法律适用,2019(8):50-60.