Abstract
In order to deeply understand the characteristics of heat-not-burn (HNB) cigarette tobacco materials prepared by different processes and their effects on the characteristics of cigarette products, four kinds of sheets with different flavors prepared respectively by rolling press (RP) , slurry process (SP), paper-making process (PP) and air-laid process (AP) were analyzed by chemical composition analysis, thermal cracking analysis and thermal weight analysis. The results are as follows. ① RP and SP tobacco materials had a low fiber content and tight structure, while PP and SP tobacco materials had a relatively high fiber content and loose structure. ② Water content of cigarette tobacco materials in HNB was similar, and the nicotine content ranged from 6.68 mg/g to 13.56 mg/g. The content of glycerol was higher than that of propylene glycol, and much higher than that in traditional cigarettes. ③ With the increase of cracking temperature, the release volume of cracking aroma of tobacco materials increased first and then decreased, peaking at 270 ℃ and then slowly decreased. The components of cracking aroma have their own characteristics. ④ TG in tobacco materials of HNB cigarettes could be divided into four stages. The main weight loss stage was the second stage and the third stage, there are some differences in the thermal weightlessness of tobacco materials.
Publication Date
5-28-2020
First Page
205
Last Page
210
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.05.038
Recommended Citation
Xue-yan, YANG; Guang-he, WEN; Feng, LI; Guo-hua, RAO; Sheng-ye, KEN; Qin, DUAN; Yun-feng, JIN; and Chao, GAO
(2020)
"Characteristic analysis of heat-not-burn cigarette tobacco materials,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 36:
Iss.
5, Article 38.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.05.038
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol36/iss5/38
References
[1] SIMONAVICIUS E,MCNEILL A,SHAHAB L,et al.Heat-not-burn tobacco products:A systematic literature review[J].Tob Control,2018,DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054419.
[2] BROSE L S,SIMONAVICIUS E,CHEESEMAN H.Awareness and use of ‘heat-not-burn’ tobacco products in great britain[J].Tob Regul Sci,2018,4(2):44-50.
[3] 朱浩,席辉,柴国璧,等.温度对加热非燃烧卷烟烟熏香成分释放的影响[J].烟草科技,2017,50(11):33-38.
[4] HUGHES J R,KEELY J P.The effect of a novel smoking system-accord-on ongoing smoking and toxin exposure[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research,2004,6:1 021-1 027.
[5] 艾思.非传统烟草制品初探[J].中国烟草,2013(5):59.
[6] WERLEY M S,FREELIN S A,WRENN S E,et al.Smoke chemistry,invitro and in vivo toxicology evaluations of the electrically heated cigarette smoking system series[J].Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,2008,52:122-139.
[7] 刘珊,崔凯,曾世通,等.加热非燃烧型烟草制品剖析[J].烟草科技,2016,49(11):56-65.
[8] 杨继,杨帅,段沅杏,等.加热不燃烧卷烟烟草材料的热分析研究[J].中国烟草学报,2015,21(6):7-13.
[9] 戴路,陶丰,袁凯龙,等.造纸法再造烟叶的研究进展[J].中国造纸学报,2013,28(1):65-69.
[10] 马鹏飞,李巧灵,林凯,等.加热非燃烧烟草薄片的热解特征研究[J].食品与机械,2018,34(4):71-74.
[11] 况志敏,刘建平,王茜茜.造纸法再造烟叶发展综述[J].纸和造纸,2018,37(6):26-31.
[12] 唐培培.烟叶原料加热非燃烧状态下释放烟气特征研究[D].郑州:中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研院,2015:79-84.
[13] 杨继,汤建国,尚善斋,等.利用顶空-GC/MS 法对比新型卷烟和传统卷烟的挥发性成分[J].烟草科技,2015,48(11):33-39.
[14] 李巧灵,刘江生,邓小华,等.烟草热解燃烧过程香味成分的释放变化[J].烟草科技,2014(11):62-66.
[15] 孔浩辉,郭璇华,沈光林.卷烟烟丝热裂解产物香味成分分析[J].烟草科技,2009(5):38-43.
[16] 戴路,史春云,卢昕博,等.加热不燃烧制品与传统卷烟再造烟叶物理特性及化学成分差异分析[J].中国烟草学报,2017,23(1):20-26.
[17] 霍现宽,刘珊,崔凯,等.加热状态下烟草烟气香味成分释放特征[J].烟草科技,2017,50(8):37-45.
[18] 谢剑平.烟草香原料[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009:262,290.
[19] MAGA J A.Contribution of phenolic compounds to smoke flavor[C]//Phenolic compounds in food and their effects on health ⅠACS Symposium Series.Washington DC:American Chemical Society,1992:170-179.
[20] 杨继,赵伟,杨柳,等.“Eclipse”卷烟的热重/差热分析[J].化学研究与应用,2015(5):560-565.
[21] 唐培培,曾世通,刘珊,等.甘油对烟叶热性能及加热状态下烟气释放的影响[J].烟草科技,2015,48(3):61-65.