Abstract
In order to investigate the difference of the puff-by-puff release of nine major components (tar, nicotine, CO, NNK, B[a]P, phenol, crotonaldehyde, HCN and NH3) in mainstream smoke of slim and normal cigarettes, typical flue-cured cigarette samples from same cut tobacco were smoked by smoking machine under ISO. Results showed that: ① The average puffs of slim and normal cigarettes were 5.49 and 6.72 respectively, which showed there were significant statistical differences. In general, the puff-by-puff and total release of all components from slim cigarette were lower than from normal cigarette. and puff-by-puff release deviations of tar, nicotine, NNK, B[a]P, phenol, HCN and NH3 in slim cigarette were smaller than normal cigarettes, while the law of CO and crotonaldehyde were opposite; ② With the proceeding of puffing, the puff-by-puff release of tar, nicotine, CO, NNK, B[a]P, phenol, HCN and NH3 release per puff increased in both slim and normal cigarettes, except the crotonaldehyde release of the first puff; ③ The correlation trend between puff-by-puff yield of nine main components and puff number in normal cigarette were more significant than slim cigarette, while the factor of tar was controlled, the degree of change in correlation was opposite.
Publication Date
7-28-2020
First Page
39
Last Page
44
DOI
10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.07.008
Recommended Citation
Qi, LIU; Meng-jie, MA; Zhen-lin, GONG; Yi-lai, YUAN; Huai-yuan, ZHU; Yang, WU; and Hui-yun, LIAO
(2020)
"Analysis of puff-by-puff release of nine main components in mainstream smoke of typical flue-cured slim and normal cigarettes,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 36:
Iss.
7, Article 8.
DOI: 10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2020.07.008
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol36/iss7/8
References
[1] 谢剑平,刘惠民,朱茂祥,等.卷烟烟气危害性指数研究[J].烟草科技,2009,42(2):5-15.
[2] 彭斌,赵乐,孙学辉,等.基于多目标决策的卷烟危害性评价[J].烟草科技,2010,43(12):31-35.
[3] 张霞,刘巍,张涛,等.烟叶原料对卷烟主流烟气7项有害成分释放量的影响研究[J].中国烟草学报,2013,19(6):1-8.
[4] SIU M,MLADJENOVIC N,SOO E.The analysis of mainstream smoke emissions of Canadian ‘super slim’ cigarettes[J].Tobacco Control,2013,DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050450.
[5] 边照阳,王颖,李中皓,等.细支卷烟主流烟气有害成分释放量的分析[J].中国烟草学报,2016,22(5):33-40.
[6] 王斌.国产细支烟发展思路探讨:以江苏中烟为例[J].现代商贸工业,2015,36(2):4-5.
[7] KASHLEY M,DIXON M,PRASAD K.Relationship between cigarette format and mouth-level exposure to tar and nicotine in smokers of Russian king-size cigarettes[J].Regul Toxicol Pharmacol,2014,70(1):430-437.
[8] 甘学文,胡启秀,蒋锦锋,等.HCI模式对超细卷烟常规烟气成分测试结果的影响[J].烟草科技,2014,47(7):40-44.
[9] 刘彤,陈欢,韩书磊,等.单光子飞行时间质谱在线逐口分析细支烟主流烟气中7种挥发性有机化合物:中国,104833719 A[P].2015-08-12.
[10] 田忠,陈闯,许宗保,等.制丝关键工序对细支卷烟燃烧温度及主流烟气成分的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2015,21(6):19-26.
[11] 葛畅,赵明月,胡有持,等.细支与常规卷烟主流烟气常规指标及中性致香成分对比分析[J].烟草科技,2017,50(4):43-50.
[12] 施丰成,罗诚,李东亮,等.接装纸透气度对不同规格卷烟感官质量和烟气化学成分的影响分析[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(12):73-80.
[13] 廖惠云,秦艳华,张华,等.GC-MS/MS 法分析细支与常规卷烟主流烟气中生物碱的逐口释放量[J].烟草科技,2018,51(6):64-72.
[14] 杨松,赵晓东,田海英,等.细支和常规卷烟主流烟气常规成分和5种关键烤甜香味成分逐口释放量的差异分析[J].中国烟草学报,2019,25(5):1-9.
[15] 袁海霞,郑茜,张胜华,等.适应细支卷烟加工特性的柔性风选系统优化设计[J].食品与机械,2019,35(9):122-126.
[16] 丁美宙,刘欢,刘强,等.梗丝形态对细支卷烟加工及综合质量的影响[J].食品与机械,2017,33(9):197-202.
[17] IRWIN W D E.The effects of circumference on mainstream delivers and composition:Progress report 2[R/OL].Southampton:BritishAmerican Tobacco,1989.[2020-02-13].http://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/lnvv0205.
[18] PERFETTI P F,TOWNSEND D E,TAYLOR J N.The effect of circumference on cigarette burn rates and deliveries:RJRT Report[R/OL].Winston-Salem:R J Reynolds Tobacco,1983.[2020-02-13].http://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/qjhg0082.
[19] SCHNEIDER M,SCHLUTER A.A semi-empirical model for simulating the effect of design components on smoke deliveries[R/OL].Southampton:British American Tobacco,1987.[2020-02-13].https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=msfl0138.
[20] CHEN P X,MOLDOVEANU S C.Mainstream smoke chemical analyses for 2R4F kentucky reference cigarette[J].Beitrge zur Tabakforschung International,2003,20(7):448-458.
[21] 马宇平,蔡莉莉,孙世豪,等.APCI-MS/MS法在线分析主流烟气气相物中7种有机化合物的逐口释放特征[J].烟草科技,2014,47(1):40-44.