•  
  •  
 

Abstract

In view of the main sticking points of rural food safety governance in practice, such as the hidden lack of grass-roots government, the limited governance ability and autonomy of village level organizations, the lack of food safety awareness and the virtual soft governance mechanism, this paper puts forward the soft governance model of promoting rural food safety, and points out that it is necessary to determine the territorial responsibility of the government and strengthen the governance function of rural food safety; Strengthen the capacity-building of food safety management and food safety publicity and education of village organizations; Build a soft governance mechanism for rural food safety, promote social cooperation, improve governance effectiveness, and make up for the shortcomings of the current hard governance of rural food safety.

Publication Date

10-28-2021

First Page

79

Last Page

82

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.10.014

References

[1] 刘文萃. 农村食品安全治理中的公众参与: 问题识别与路径选择: 基于天津调研的实证分析[J]. 云南行政学院学报, 2015, 17(6): 161-167.
[2] 吴林海, 龚晓茹, 吕煜昕. 村民自治组织参与农村食品安全风险治理的动因与路径[J]. 江海学刊, 2017(3): 76-81, 238.
[3] 范海玉, 申静. 公众参与农村食品安全监管的困境及对策[J]. 人民论坛, 2013(23): 40-41.
[4] 张志勋. 论农村食品安全多元治理模式之构建[J]. 法学论坛, 2017, 32(4): 119-124.
[5] 李蛟. 农村食品安全监管的困境及解决对策[J]. 农业经济, 2018(4): 143-144.
[6] 张蓓, 马如秋. 论农村食品安全风险社会共治[J]. 人文杂志, 2020(4): 104-112.
[7] 唐彰元. 旅游食品安全治理中社会监督机制[J]. 食品与机械, 2020, 36(6): 104-105.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.