•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The legal regulation system of genetically modified food risk in the United States, the European Union, Japan, Australia and other countries is quite different. Through comparative analysis, it is helpful to study the reasons of the system differences and to improve the legal regulation of genetically modified food risk in China.

Publication Date

12-28-2021

First Page

76

Last Page

79,131

DOI

10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2021.12.012

References

[1] ROBERTSON E. Finding a compromise in the debate over genetically modified food: An introduction to a model state consumer right-to-know act[J]. Journal of Science and Technology Law, 2003, 9(1): 71.
[2] 连丽霞, 王永佳. 美国与欧盟各国转基因食品安全管理比较研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2010(5): 52.
[3] 张涛. 食品安全法律规制研究[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2006: 121.
[4] 罗成炳, 邵军辉. 转基因食品安全法律规制研究[M]. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 2014: 50.
[5] SMITH L M. Divided we fall: The shortcomings of the european union's proposal for independent member states to regulate the cultivation of genetically modified organisms[J]. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 2012, 33(3): 35-38.
[6] 刘旭霞, 李洁瑜, 朱鹏. 美欧日转基因食品监管法律制度分析及启示[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(2): 26-27.
[7] 杨桂玲, 张志恒, 袁玉伟, 等. 澳大利亚转基因食品溯源管理体系研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011(4): 371-372.
[8] 张瑞. 转基因食品法律规制研究: 评《转基因食品法律规制研究》[J]. 食品工业, 2020(1): 51-52.
[9] 王婷. 我国转基因食品法律规制研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2015: 30.
[10] 赵新, 赵云芬. 转基因食品安全的法律规制研究[J]. 经济师, 2020(12): 79.
[11] 赵伟勋. 以转基因食品的风险特性构建标识制度[J]. 农业科技管理, 2021(10): 39-40.
[12] 葛馨玥, 刘鑫. 从法律角度探究转基因食品安全事件应对机制[J]. 法制与社会, 2020(7): 135.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.