Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to analysis the effect of cultivars on the adaptability of kiwifruit processing to chips while six cultivars of kiwifruit were used as the raw material. Methods: Kiwifruit chips were prepared by the method of vacuum freeze-dried. Sensory evaluation and nine indexes such as the yield of kiwifruit chips, water-soluble pectin, acid-soluble pectin, soluble sugar, total acid content, sugar-acid ratio. ascorbic acid content, hardness and crispness of kiwifruit chips were analyzed. Results: There were significantly differences among yield, nutrient content and sensory indicators in kiwifruit chips while the kiwifruit chips were prepared with different cultivars. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Jinyan" were higher in yield, water-soluble pectin, soluble sugar and hardness of kiwifruit chips, but were lower in total acid content and crispness of kiwifruit chips. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Jinmei" were higher in yield, water-soluble pectin, soluble sugar and ascorbic acid, and were lower in total acid, hardness and crispness of kiwi fruit chips. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Jinyuan" were higher in water-soluble pectin, acid-soluble pectin, bound-pectin, soluble sugar, total acid and ascorbic acid, and were lower in hardness and crispness of kiwi fruit chips. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Jintao" were higher in yield, sugar-acid ratio, ascorbic acid, hardness and crispness of the chips, and were lower in water-soluble pectin and total acid in kiwifruit chips. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Cuiyu" were higher in yield, sugar-acid ratio, crispness of kiwifruit chips, and were lower in acid-soluble pectin, bound-pectin, soluble sugar, total acid and hardness of chips. Kiwifruit chips with cultivar name "Donghong" were higher in yield of kiwifruit chips, acid-soluble pectin, bound-pectin, soluble sugar, sugar-acid ratio and hardness of chips, and were lower in water-soluble pectin, total acid and crispness of chips. Conclusion: The cultivars of kiwifruit had extremely effect on the yield, nutrient content and sensory indicators of kiwifruit chips. Kiwifruit named "Donghong" was considered as the optimal cultivar to be prepared kiwifruit chips by vacuum freeze-drying method.
Publication Date
12-28-2022
First Page
21
Last Page
27
DOI
10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.80214
Recommended Citation
Chuan-hui, AN; Wen-jun, HUANG; Cai-hong, ZHONG; Jian-jun, HE; Xue-ling, CHEN; and Qi, ZHANG
(2022)
"Evaluation of the effect of kiwifruit cultivars on the quality of kiwifruit chips,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 38:
Iss.
12, Article 3.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.80214
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol38/iss12/3
References
[1] HAMMAMI C,REN F,MARIN M.Process-quality optimization of the vacuum freeze-drying of apple slices by the response surface method[J].International Journal of Food Science & Technology,1999,34(2):145-160.
[2] 李翔,聂青玉,许彦.三种干燥方式制备的猕猴桃脆片品质比较[J].南方农业,2021,15(28):33-36.LI X,NIE Q Y,XU Y.Quality comparison of kiwifruit chips prepared by three drying methods[J].South China Agriculture,2021,15(28):33-36.
[3] 魏丽红,翟秋喜.软枣猕猴桃真空冷冻干燥条件的筛选[J].辽宁农业职业技术学院学报,2019,21(5):7-9.WEI L H,ZHAI Q X.Study on the optimum vacuum freeze-drying conditions for kiwifruits[J].Journal of Liaoning Agricultural Technical College,2019,21(5):7-9.
[4] 曾凡杰,孟莉,吕远平.不同前处理和冻结方式对猕猴桃片干制品品质的影响[J].食品科技,2017,42(8):63-68.ZENG F J,MENG L,LU Y P.Effect of different pre-processing and freezing methods on the dry products quality of kiwi fruit slices[J].Food Science and Technology,2017,42(8):63-68.
[5] YANG Q N,YANG X H,ZHANG Q L,et al.Quantifying soluble sugar in super sweet corn using near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics[J].Optik,2020,220:165128.
[6] MANZOOR S,GULL A,WANI S M,et al.Improving the shelf life of fresh cut kiwi using nanoemulsion coatings with antioxidant and antimicrobial agents[J].Food Bioscience,2021,41:101015.
[7] 郭琳琳,庞荣丽,罗静,等.猕猴桃果实采后常温贮藏期品质评价[J].中国果树,2021(10):18-24.GUO L L,PANG R L,LUO J,et al.Quality evaluation of kiwifruit during postharvest storage[J].China Fruit Tree,2021(10):18-24.
[8] 易淑瑶,刘青,贾东峰,等.不同结果母枝粗度对“东红”猕猴桃果实品质的影响[J].中国南方果树,2020,49(4):122-126.YI S Y,LIU Q,JIA D F,et al.Effects of different fruiting mother branch roughness on fruit quality of "Donghong" kiwifruit[J].China Southern Fruit Trees,2020,49(4):122-126.
[9] 黄文俊,江昌应,陈美艳,等.三个产地猕猴桃品种‘金梅’在低温贮藏及货架期内的采后生理和品质变化[J].植物科学学报,2020,38(5):687-695.HUANG W J,JIANG C Y,CHEN M Y,et al.Changes in postharvest physiology and fruit quality of Actinidia chinensis Planch.'Jinmei' from three different production regions during cool storage and shelf life[J].Plant Science Journal,2020,38(5):687-695.
[10] 宋海岩,涂美艳,刘春阳,等.夏季修剪对‘翠玉’猕猴桃植株生长及果实品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2020,33(7):1 561-1 565.SONG H Y,TU M Y,LIU C Y,et al.Effect of summer pruning on growth and fruit quality of 'Cuiyu' kiwifruit[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2020,33(7):1 561-1 565.
[11] 袁华玲,周亚兰,陈延松,等.不同品种黄肉猕猴桃品质分析[J].合肥师范学院学报,2016,34(6):50-52.YUAN H L,ZHOU Y L,CHEN Y S,et al.The analysis and evaluation on yellow-fleshed kiwifruit quality of different variety[J].Journal of Hefei Normal University,2016,34(6):50-52.
[12] 刘晓娟,马克平.植物功能性状研究进展[J].中国科学:生命科学,2015,45(4):325-339.LIU X J,MA K P.Plant functional traits-concepts,applications and future directions[J].Science in China:Life Sciences,2015,45(4):325-339.
[13] 陈双双,贺艳群,徐小彪,等.江西省不同产地“金艳”猕猴桃果实品质比较分析[J].中国南方果树,2022,51(2):113-116.CHEN S S,HE Y Q,XU X B,et al.Comparative analysis of fruit quality of "Jinyan" kiwifruit from different origins in Jiangxi Province[J].China Southern Fruit Trees,2022,51(2):113-116.
[14] 张晓晴,吕真真,刘慧,等.不同品种桃果酒品质特性与酿酒适宜性评价[J].果树学报,2021,38(8):1 368-1 380.ZHANG X Q,LU Z Z,LIU H,et al.Characteristics of peach wines made from different cultivars and evaluation on their suitability for wine brewing[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2021,38(8):1 368-1 380.
[15] WANG H,WANG J,MUJUMDAR A S,et al.Effects of postharvest ripening on physicochemical properties,micro-structure,cell wall polysaccharides contents(pectin,hemicellulose,cellulose)and nanostructure of kiwifruit(Actinidia deliciosa)[J].Food Hydrocolloids,2021,118:106808.