Abstract
Objective: To determine the key points of pear quality formation and deterioration of different Pyrus pyrifolia pears during cold storage. Methods: Zaoshengxinshui, Hujingli18, Hujingli67 were used as materials, the fruit of three varieties with the same ripeness were stored in cold storage at (1.0±0.5) ℃ and relative humidity of 85%~90% for 60 days, fruit texture, total soluble solids, titratable acid, sugar and acid contents and 10 sensor values were determined every 10 days. Results: Hujingli18 and Zaoshengxinshui were the typical type of fructose accumulation,Hujingli 67 was the type of sorbitol accumulation, and all three varieties were the type of malic acid accumulation. During cold storage, the fruit of Hujingli67 can maintain higher firmness with peel, firmness of pulp, crispness and chewiness; Higher content of glucose, sorbitol and total sugar; Stable content of titratable acid and malic acid; The storage flavor is less controlled by the cold storage time; Through the cold storage technology, it shows rich in storage. Hujingli18 is superior to Zaoshengxinshui in peel characteristics, compactness and crispness. Hujingli18 has high fructose, malic acid content and fructose/total sugar, which can keep high sweetness and acidity, and has strong flavor in storage. Zaoshengxinshui is easy to be softened, the content of titratable acid shows a sharp decline trend, the comprehensive flavor is regulated by the storage time, and is less resistant to cold storage. The volatile compounds in fruit of Zaoshengxinshui and Hujing pear 67 were obviously changed, especially the volatile compounds such as nitrogen oxides, methane, sulfur compounds and ethanol. Conclusion: The safe cold storage periods of Zaoxinshui, Hujing pear 18 and Hujing pear 67 are 30,40 and 60 days, respectively.
Publication Date
4-25-2023
First Page
125
Last Page
131
DOI
10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.80311
Recommended Citation
Hui-juan, ZHOU; Zheng-wen, YE; Si-yi, ZENG; Xiao-qing, WANG; and Jun, LUO
(2023)
"Evaluation on fruit texture and quality of different pear varieties during cold storage,"
Food and Machinery: Vol. 39:
Iss.
1, Article 21.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2022.80311
Available at:
https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol39/iss1/21
References
[1] 骆军, 许苏梅, 练雪兴, 等. 早熟、优质砂梨新品种‘早生新水’[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(1): 212.
[2] 王晓庆, 骆军, 施春晖, 等. 早熟砂梨新品种‘沪晶梨18号’的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(7): 1 201-1 203.
[3] 王晓庆, 骆军, 施春晖, 等. 早熟砂梨新品种‘沪晶67号’的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(S1): 166-168.
[4] 周慧娟, 叶正文, 骆军, 等. 气调处理对‘早生新水’梨贮藏品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(28): 143-152.
[5] 孙希生, 王文辉, 李志强, 等. 1-MCP对砀山酥梨保鲜效果的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2001(6): 14-17.
[6] 闫根柱, 李建华, 王春生, 等. 日韩梨贮藏保鲜技术研究与应用进展[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2007, 41(4): 4-6.
[7] SU M S, ZHANG B, YE Z W, et al. Pulp volatiles measured by an electronic nose are related to harvest season, TSS concentration and TSS/TA ratio among 39 peaches and nectarines[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 150: 146-153.
[8] 李丽娜, 赵武奇, 曾祥源, 等. 苹果的质构与感官评定相关性研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2017, 33(6): 37-45.
[9] 胡红菊, 陈启亮, 王友平, 等. 4个砂梨品种果实发育过程中主要糖酸含量的变化[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2007, 26(2): 251-255.
[10] 牛佳佳, 张四普, 张柯, 等. 9个梨品种综合品质评价分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(17): 149-156.
[11] 刘松忠, 刘军, 张媛, 等. 不同成熟期白梨品种糖酸质量分数及风味评价[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(1): 97-102.
[12] 姚改芳, 张绍铃, 吴俊, 等. 10个不同系统梨品种的可溶性糖与有机酸组分含量分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(5): 25-31.
[13] HUDINA M, TAMPAR F. Sugars and organic acids contents of European(Pyrus communis L.) and Asian(Pyrus serotina Rehd.)pear cultivars[J]. Acta Aliment, 2000, 29(3): 217-230.
[14] 蒋爽, 岳晓燕, 滕元文, 等. 不同砂梨果实中糖酸含量及代谢相关基因表达分析[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(S1): 65-70.
[15] 张燕子. 不同苹果糖酸组成及苹果酸转运体功能研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2010: 72-73.
[16] 靳志飞, 杨家全, 陈红, 等. 八个贵州地方桃品种果实甜酸风味品质分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(1): 90-97.
[17] 李艳萍, 牛建新, 陈清. 桃果实中糖酸物质代谢的影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(8): 212-216.
[18] RAPPARINI F, PREDIERI S. Pear fruit volatiles[J]. Horticultural Reviews, 2010, 28: 237-324.
[19] 王颖, 张文君, 李慧冬, 等. 金川雪梨和秦酥挥发性芳香物质的SPME-GC-MS分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(1): 160-166.
[20] CORRADO D N, ANTONELLA M, EUGENIO M, et al. Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines[J]. Sensors and Actuators B, 2001, 77(1): 561-566.
[21] 闫子茹, 岳盈肖, 赵江丽, 等. 基于电子鼻分析1-MCP对‘香红’梨后熟进程的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(4): 271-276.
[22] 赵策, 马飒飒, 张磊, 等. 基于电子鼻技术的皇冠梨腐败等级分类研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(3): 246-258.
[23] HUI G H, WU Y L, YE D D, et al. Study of peach freshness predictive method based on electronic nose[J]. Food Control, 2012, 28(1): 25-32.
[24] 严娟, 蔡志翔, 张明昊, 等. 利用电子鼻评价桃果实香气[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(1): 274-282.
[25] 李国鹏, 贾惠娟, 李红旭, 等. 利用电子鼻对不同梨品种进行区分的初步研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(5): 1 029-1 033.
[26] 周慧娟, 乔勇进, 王海宏, 等. 低温对“大团蜜露”水蜜桃保鲜效果的影响[J]. 制冷学报, 2009, 30(5): 41-44.
[27] 严娟, 蔡志翔, 马瑞娟, 等. 高效液相色谱搭载可变波长检测器测定桃果肉中糖组分[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(4): 887-892.
[28] 周慧娟, 叶正文, 王戈, 等. 采前套袋对黄肉桃货架期果皮超微结构的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(8): 1 000-1 006.
[29] 程玉豆, 张亚光, 关军锋, 等. 1-MCP和延迟冷藏对‘早红考密斯’梨货架期间品质和软化相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(22): 4 658-4 666.
[30] 庄晓红, 刘声远, 马岩松, 等. 常温条件下南果梨主要营养成分及其变化规律的研究[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2008, 45(2): 34-37.
[31] ZHAO J B, JIANG Q, GUO J Y, et al. Flavor quality identification and cultivar selection of peach[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2007(6): 165-168.
[32] 霍月青, 胡红菊, 彭抒昂, 等. 砂梨品种资源有机酸含量及发育期变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 216-223.
[33] 李树玲, 黄礼森. 不同种内梨品种果实糖、酸含量分析比较[J]. 中国果树, 1995(3): 9-12.