Determination and comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of 12 kinds of potatoes

Authors

SHAO Guoli, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China;Tarim University Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China
TAN Zhanming, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China;Tarim University Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, ChinaFollow
CHENG Yunxia, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China;Tarim University Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China
LI Wenbo, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China;Tarim University Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China
SUN Wanting, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China;Tarim University Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Facility Agriculture, Arar, Xinjiang 843300, China

Corresponding Author(s)

谭占明（1991—），男，塔里木大学副教授，硕士。E-mail：tlmdxtzm@taru.edu.cn

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to screen potato varieties suitable for cultivation in southern Xinjiang. Methods: By combining factor analysis and cluster analysis, a comprehensive evaluation of the nutritional quality of 12 kinds of introduced potato species was conducted using them as test materials. Results: S1 contained the most protein, and S5 included the most soluble sugar content and vitamin C; S12 contained the least nitrate, and S10 contained the most reduced sugar and starch. Nutritional quality indicators differ significantly among potato varieties. The coefficients of variation of soluble sugar content, vitamin C content, and nitrate content were 47.13%, 37.03% and 33.38%, respectively. The two primary components identified by factor analysis were the protein content and vitamin C content, and the potato quality was further divided into 3 clusters using systematic cluster analysis. Conclusion: The five varieties S1, S5, S7, S10 and S11 are suitable for promotion in the southern Xinjiang region.

Publication Date

12-26-2023

First Page

146

Last Page

149,174

DOI

10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2023.80104

Recommended Citation

Guoli, SHAO; Zhanming, TAN; Yunxia, CHENG; Wenbo, LI; and Wanting, SUN (2023) "Determination and comprehensive evaluation of nutritional quality of 12 kinds of potatoes," Food and Machinery: Vol. 39: Iss. 10, Article 22.
DOI: 10.13652/j.spjx.1003.5788.2023.80104
Available at: https://www.ifoodmm.cn/journal/vol39/iss10/22

References

[1] 张帆, 李源, 陈梦茹, 等. 20个马铃薯品种品质比较与综合评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51（8）: 28-36. ZHANG F, LI Y, CHEN M R, et al. Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of quality of 20 potato varieties[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51（8）: 28-36.
[2] 张心如, 王志贤, 贺志强. 马铃薯品种比较试验[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2022, 45（2）: 6-9. ZHANG X R, WANG Z X, HE Z Q. Comparative trials of potato varieties[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2022, 45（2）: 6-9.
[3] 刘春红, 苏伟健, 佟淑灵. 新疆马铃薯种植生产情况简要分析[J]. 种子科技, 2018, 36（6）: 20. LIU C H, SU W J, TONG S L. A brief analysis of potato planting and production in Xinjiang[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2018, 36（6）: 20.
[4] 张旭. 新疆马铃薯产业化现状和发展前景[J]. 新疆农机化, 2007（4）: 45-46. ZHANG X. Current situation and development prospect of potato industrialization in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Mechanization, 2007（4）: 45-46.
[5] 王美珍, 季蒙, 张文军, 等. DTOPSIS法在柠条品系综合评价中的应用[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2012, 38（4）: 19-22. WANG M Z, JI M, ZHANG W J, et al. Application of DTOPSIS method in comprehensive evaluation of lemon strains[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology, 2012, 38（4）: 19-22.
[6] 岳新丽, 王春珍, 梁秀芝, 等. 新疆奇台县马铃薯新品种引进及筛选[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47（1）: 53-55, 60. YUE X L, WANG C Z, LIANG X Z, et al. Introduction and screening of new potato varieties in Qitai County of Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47（1）: 53-55, 60.
[7] 何文, 张秀芬, 郭素云, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对22份马铃薯种质的综合评价[J]. 种子, 2021, 40（3）: 80-86. HE W, ZHANG X F, GUO S Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of 22 potato germplasms based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Seed, 2021, 40（3）: 80-86.
[8] 邹淑萍, 赵婷, 邰晓亮, 等. 新疆主栽品种马铃薯品质及其聚类分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38（11）: 295-298. ZOU S P, ZHAO T, TAI X L, et al. Quality and cluster analysis of potato varieties mainly grown in Xinjiang[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, 38（11）: 295-298.
[9] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. GAO J F. Plant physiology laboratory instruction[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
[10] 崔辉梅, 石国亮, 安君和. 马铃薯还原糖含量测定方法的比较研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006（19）: 4 821-4 823. CUI H M, SHI G L, AN J H. Comparison study on the testing method of the content of reduced sugar in potato[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006（19）: 4 821-4 823.
[11] 张治安, 陈展宇. 植物生理学[M]. 长春: 吉林大学出版社, 2009: 51-54. ZHANG Z A, CHEN Z Y. Plant physiology[M]. Changchun: Jilin University Press, 2009: 51-54.
[12] 魏珂萍, 刘宗云, 刘敏, 等. 用2种紫外分光光度法测定新鲜蔬菜硝酸盐的比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006（4）: 619, 638. WEI K P, LIU Z Y, LIU M, et al. Comparison of two UV spectrophotometric methods for the determination of nitrate in fresh vegetables[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006（4）: 619, 638.
[13] 桂敏, 龙洪进, 钟秋月, 等. 引进辣椒种质资源果实性状的多元统计分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27（2）: 772-776. GUI M, LONG H J, ZHONG Q Y, et al. Multivariate statistical analysis of fruit characters of hot pepper germplasm resources[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27（2）: 772-776.